Improving Reading Ability Using Cooperative Integrated Reading And Composition (CIRC) Learning Method In Class XI Students Of SMAN 1 Gunungsari

Authors

  • Muhammad Saofa Program Studi Pendidikan Bahasa Inggris, Universitas Mataram, Indonesia
  • Iqbal Ramadahan Program Studi Pendidikan Bahasa Inggris, Universitas Mataram, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.70716/jess.v1i2.103

Keywords:

Cooperative Integrated Reading and Composition (CIRC), Reading Ability, Secondary Education, Literacy Improvement

Abstract

This study investigates the effectiveness of the Cooperative Integrated Reading and Composition (CIRC) learning method in enhancing the reading ability of Class XI students at SMAN 1 Gunungsari. The research was conducted as a classroom action study, employing a cyclical process of planning, action, observation, and reflection. Data were collected through reading performance assessments, student questionnaires, and observational field notes. The findings reveal a significant improvement in students' reading comprehension, vocabulary acquisition, and critical analysis skills after implementing the CIRC method. Additionally, the collaborative nature of CIRC fostered greater student engagement and active participation in learning activities. The study concludes that the CIRC learning method is an effective pedagogical approach for improving reading skills in secondary education and recommends its broader application to enhance literacy outcomes. Further research is suggested to explore the method’s adaptability across diverse learning contexts and student demographics.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Gillies, R. M. (2007). Cooperative learning: Integrating theory and practice. SAGE Publications.

Graham, S., & Perin, D. (2007). Writing next: Effective strategies to improve writing of adolescents in middle and high schools. A report to Carnegie Corporation of New York. Alliance for Excellent Education.

Guthrie, J. T., & Wigfield, A. (2000). Engagement and motivation in reading. Handbook of Reading Research, 3, 403-422.

Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (2009). An educational psychology success story: Social interdependence theory and cooperative learning. Educational Researcher, 38(5), 365-379.

Kagan, S. (1994). Cooperative learning. San Clemente, CA: Kagan Publishing.

Roseth, C. J., Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (2008). Promoting early adolescents’ achievement and peer relationships: The effects of cooperative, competitive, and individualistic goal structures. Psychological Bulletin, 134(2), 223-246.

Slavin, R. E. (1995). Cooperative learning: Theory, research, and practice. Allyn and Bacon.

Sharan, S. (1994). Handbook of cooperative learning methods. Greenwood Press.

Snow, C. E. (2002). Reading for understanding: Toward an R&D program in reading comprehension. Rand Corporation.

Stevens, R. J., Madden, N. A., Slavin, R. E., & Farnish, A. M. (1987). Cooperative integrated reading and composition: Two field experiments. Reading Research Quarterly, 22(4), 433-454.

Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.

Downloads

Published

2025-02-24

How to Cite

Saofa, M., & Ramadahan, I. (2025). Improving Reading Ability Using Cooperative Integrated Reading And Composition (CIRC) Learning Method In Class XI Students Of SMAN 1 Gunungsari. Journal of Education and Social Science, 1(2), 18–23. https://doi.org/10.70716/jess.v1i2.103