Organizational Justice Among Private University Lecturers in Riau, Indonesia

Authors

  • Arrafiqur Rahman Department of Management, Universitas Pasir Pengaraian, Indonesia
  • Norhayah Zulkifli Department of Management, Universiti Selangor, Malaysia
  • Adolf Bastian Department of Management Education, Universitas Lancang Kuning, Indonesia
  • Gilang Nugroho Department of Management, Universitas Islam Riau, Indonesia
  • Andi Afrizal Department of Management, Universitas Pasir Pengaraian, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.70716/ecoma.v4i2.480

Keywords:

Organizational justice, private university, lecturers, Riau, Indonesia, descriptive survey

Abstract

Organizational justice, defined as employees’ perceptions of fairness in institutional outcomes, procedures, and interpersonal treatment, is a crucial issue in human resource management, particularly in higher education. While this construct has been widely examined in Western corporate and healthcare contexts, empirical evidence from private higher education institutions in developing economies remains limited and inconsistent. Indonesian private university lecturers have received little scholarly attention, despite ongoing welfare and governance challenges. Addressing this gap, this study investigates lecturers’ perceptions of organizational justice in private universities in Riau Province, Indonesia. Using a quantitative survey design with proportional stratified random sampling, data were collected from 298 lecturers across seven private universities. The research instrument, adapted from Colquitt and Zipay (2015), measured three dimensions of organizational justice: distributive, procedural, and interactional justice, through 20 items on a five-point Likert scale. Descriptive statistical analysis was employed to calculate achievement scores for each item and dimension. The findings show a mean organizational justice score of 3.167, with an achievement level of 63.35%, indicating that lecturers perceive institutional fairness as moderately adequate. The highest frequency appeared in the 56–64 interval class, suggesting a generally moderate perception of justice. These results indicate the need for private universities in Riau to strengthen fairness in reward distribution, decision-making procedures, and interpersonal treatment. This study contributes an empirical baseline for organizational justice among lecturers in a resource-constrained Indonesian higher education context and offers practical insights for governance reform and human resource policy development.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Adams, J. S. (1965). Inequity in social exchange. In Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 267–299). Academic Press.

Adamovic, M. (2023). Organizational justice research: A review, synthesis, and research agenda. European Management Review, 20(4), 851–871. https://doi.org/10.1111/emre.12564

Ambrose, M. L., & Schminke, M. (2009). The role of overall justice judgments in organizational justice research: A test of mediation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94(2), 491–500. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0013203

Bies, R. J., & Moag, J. F. (1986). Interactional justice: Communication criteria of fairness. In R. J. Lewicki, B. H. Sheppard, & M. H. Bazerman (Eds.), Research on negotiation in organizations (Vol. 1, pp. 43–55). JAI Press.

Bosch, A. (2024). Organizational and social justice paradoxes in EDI. Frontiers in Psychology, 15, Article 1320993. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1320993

Chen, L., Cao, X., Sun, J., & Qin, X. (2024). The impact of fairness and psychological safety on employees’ attitudes and behaviours: Evidence from the retail industry. Sustainability, 16(6), Article 2454. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16062454

Cohen-Charash, Y., & Spector, P. E. (2001). The role of justice in organizations: A meta-analysis. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 86(2), 278–321. https://doi.org/10.1006/obhd.2001.2958

Colquitt, J. A. (2001). On the dimensionality of organizational justice: A construct validation of a measure. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(3), 386–400. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.86.3.386

Colquitt, J. A., & Zipay, K. (2015). Justice, fairness, and employee reactions. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 2, 75–99. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-060414-111457

Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (5th ed.). SAGE Publications.

Dialeksis. (2024, May 20). Nasib dosen swasta terganyang putusan MK. https://dialeksis.com/nasional/nasib-dosen-swasta-terganyang-putusan-mk/

Gojny-Zbierowska, M. (2024). When there is no justice, we need an old HERO: The trickle-down effect of psychological capital—the moderating role of organizational justice and leaders’ age. Frontiers in Psychology, 15, Article 1256721. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1256721

Greenberg, J. (1990). Organizational justice: Yesterday, today, and tomorrow. Journal of Management, 16(2), 399–432. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920639001600208

Gunawan, J., & Waluyo, B. M. (2016). Penyusunan statuta perguruan tinggi swasta. Kementerian Riset, Teknologi dan Perguruan Tinggi, Direktorat Jenderal Kelembagaan Iptek.

Hermanto, Y. B., & Srimulyani, V. A. (2022). The effects of organizational justice on employee performance, with the dimension of organizational citizenship behavior as a mediating variable. Sustainability, 14, Article 13322. https://doi.org/10.3390/su142013322

Hery. (2016). Penyusunan peraturan akademik perguruan tinggi: Materi workshop peningkatan tata kelola perguruan tinggi swasta di lingkungan KOPERTIS Wilayah 10, Pekanbaru, 18–21 Oktober 2016. Kopertis Wilayah 10.

Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan Indonesia. (2020). Rencana Strategis Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan Tahun 2020–2024. https://jdih.kemdikbud.go.id

Kompas.com. (2025, May 21). Dosen kerja seminggu sampai 70 jam, menguras tenaga dan demi uang tambahan. https://www.kompas.com/edu/read/2025/05/21/171005671

Le, H., & Pan, L. (2021). Examining the empirical redundancy of organizational justice constructs. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 165, 21–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2021.03.003

Moorman, R. H. (1991). Relationship between organizational justice and organizational citizenship behaviors: Do fairness perceptions influence employee citizenship? Journal of Applied Psychology, 76(6), 845–855. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.76.6.845

Niehoff, B. P., & Moorman, R. H. (1993). Justice as a mediator of the relationship between methods of monitoring and organizational citizenship behavior. Academy of Management Journal, 36(3), 527–556. https://doi.org/10.2307/256591

Rbiaa, O., & Dextras-Gauthier, J. (2025). Unpacking the link between organizational justice and innovative behavior: A meta-analytic review across sectors. Cogent Business & Management, 12(1), Article 2546560. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2025.2546560

Sugiyono. (2024). Metode penelitian kuantitatif, kualitatif, dan R&D. Alfabeta.

Xu, Q., & Jiang, Z. (2024). The impact of organizational justice on turnover intention among primary healthcare workers: The mediating role of work motivation. Risk Management and Healthcare Policy, 17, 2341–2355. https://doi.org/10.2147/RMHP.S453296

Zhao, S., Ma, Z., Li, H., Wang, Z., Wang, Y., & Ma, H. (2024). The impact of organizational justice on turnover intention among primary healthcare workers: The mediating role of work motivation. Risk Management and Healthcare Policy, 17, 3017–3028. https://doi.org/10.2147/RMHP.S486535

Downloads

Published

2026-06-17

How to Cite

Rahman, A., Zulkifli, N., Bastian, A., Nugroho, G., & Andi Afrizal. (2026). Organizational Justice Among Private University Lecturers in Riau, Indonesia. Journal of Economics and Management, 4(2), 255–268. https://doi.org/10.70716/ecoma.v4i2.480