Corporate Governance, ESG Disclosure, and Firm Value: Evidence from Public Companies in Indonesia
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.70716/ecoma.v3i2.235Keywords:
Corporate Governance, ESG Disclosure, Firm Value, Tobin’s Q, Indonesia, IDXAbstract
This study examines the influence of corporate governance and Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) disclosure on firm value in publicly listed companies in Indonesia. The research utilizes a quantitative approach with secondary data derived from annual and sustainability reports of 120 non-financial companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange (IDX) between 2018 and 2022. Corporate governance is measured using board characteristics, including board size, independence, and gender diversity, while ESG disclosure is assessed through a modified GRI-based content analysis index. Firm value is proxied by Tobin’s Q. The results of panel data regression analysis indicate that board independence and ESG disclosure have a significant positive impact on firm value, while board size shows a negative but insignificant effect. These findings suggest that strong governance structures and transparent ESG practices contribute to market-based performance and investor confidence. The study provides theoretical contributions to stakeholder theory and practical implications for corporate policy-makers and regulators in emerging markets.
Downloads
References
Ali, W., Frynas, J. G., & Mahmood, Z. (2017). Determinants of corporate social responsibility (CSR) disclosure in developed and developing countries: A literature review. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 24(4), 273–294. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.1410
Amran, A., Lee, S. P., & Devi, S. S. (2014). The influence of governance structure and strategic corporate social responsibility toward sustainability reporting quality. Business Strategy and the Environment, 23(4), 217–235. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.1767
Barako, D. G., Hancock, P., & Izan, H. Y. (2006). Factors influencing voluntary corporate disclosure by Kenyan companies. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 14(2), 107–125. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8683.2006.00491.x
Bhimani, A., Silvola, H., & Sivabalan, P. (2016). Voluntary corporate social responsibility reporting: A study of early and late reporter motivations and outcomes. Journal of Management Accounting Research, 28(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.2308/jmar-51440
Cucari, N., Esposito De Falco, S., & Orlando, B. (2018). Diversity of board of directors and environmental social governance: Evidence from Italian listed companies. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 25(3), 250–266. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.1452
Dhaliwal, D. S., Li, O. Z., Tsang, A., & Yang, Y. G. (2011). Voluntary nonfinancial disclosure and the cost of equity capital: The initiation of corporate social responsibility reporting. The Accounting Review, 86(1), 59–100. https://doi.org/10.2308/accr.00000005
Eccles, R. G., & Klimenko, S. (2019). The investor revolution. Harvard Business Review, 97(3), 106–116.
El Ghoul, S., Guedhami, O., Wang, H., & Kwok, C. C. (2018). Corporate environmental responsibility and the cost of capital: International evidence. Journal of Business Ethics, 149(2), 335–361. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-016-3154-2
Elkington, J. (1998). Cannibals with forks: The triple bottom line of 21st century business. New Society Publishers.
Frias‐Aceituno, J. V., Rodríguez‐Ariza, L., & Garcia‐Sánchez, I. M. (2013). The role of the board in the dissemination of integrated corporate social reporting. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 20(4), 219–233. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.1294
García‐Sánchez, I. M., Hussain, N., Khan, S. A., & Martínez‐Ferrero, J. (2021). Do markets value corporate governance and CSR disclosure?: Evidence from emerging countries. Business Strategy and the Environment, 30(2), 989–1006. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2667
Gillan, S. L., Koch, A., & Starks, L. T. (2021). Firms and social responsibility: A review of ESG and CSR research in corporate finance. Journal of Corporate Finance, 66, 101889. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2021.101889
Hussain, N., Rigoni, U., & Orij, R. P. (2018). Corporate governance and sustainability performance: Analysis of triple bottom line performance. Journal of Business Ethics, 149, 411–432. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-016-3099-5
Ioannou, I., & Serafeim, G. (2015). The impact of corporate social responsibility on investment recommendations: Analysts’ perceptions and shifting institutional logics. Strategic Management Journal, 36(7), 1053–1081. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.2268
Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3(4), 305–360. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-405X(76)90026-X
Khan, M., Serafeim, G., & Yoon, A. (2016). Corporate sustainability: First evidence on materiality. The Accounting Review, 91(6), 1697–1724. https://doi.org/10.2308/accr-51383
Kolk, A. (2008). Sustainability, accountability and corporate governance: Exploring multinationals’ reporting practices. Business Strategy and the Environment, 17(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.511
Luo, X., Wang, H., Raithel, S., & Zheng, Q. (2015). Corporate social performance, analyst stock recommendations, and firm future returns. Strategic Management Journal, 36(1), 123–136. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.2203
Michelon, G., Pilonato, S., & Ricceri, F. (2015). CSR reporting practices and the quality of disclosure: An empirical analysis. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 33, 59–78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpa.2014.10.003
Nawaz, T. (2017). Exploring the nexus between human capital, corporate governance and performance: Evidence from Islamic banks. Journal of Business Ethics, 157(2), 567–587. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-017-3694-0
Post, C., & Byron, K. (2015). Women on boards and firm financial performance: A meta-analysis. Academy of Management Journal, 58(5), 1546–1571. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2013.0319
Rao, K., & Tilt, C. (2016). Board diversity and CSR reporting: An Australian study. Meditari Accountancy Research, 24(2), 182–210. https://doi.org/10.1108/MEDAR-08-2015-0052
Renneboog, L., Ter Horst, J., & Zhang, C. (2008). Socially responsible investments: Institutional aspects, performance, and investor behavior. Journal of Banking & Finance, 32(9), 1723–1742. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2007.12.039
Saeidi, S. P., Sofian, S., Saeidi, P., Saeidi, S. P., & Saaeidi, S. A. (2015). How does corporate social responsibility contribute to firm financial performance? The mediating role of competitive advantage, reputation, and customer satisfaction. Journal of Business Research, 68(2), 341–350. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2014.06.024
Shamil, M. M., Shaikh, J. M., Ho, P. L., & Krishnan, A. (2014). The influence of board characteristics on sustainability reporting: Empirical evidence from Sri Lankan firms. Asian Review of Accounting, 22(2), 78–97. https://doi.org/10.1108/ARA-09-2013-0060
Singh, G., & Dwesar, R. (2022). Board gender diversity, firm performance and firm risk: A literature survey. Copernican Journal of Finance & Accounting, 11(3), 69–84. https://doi.org/10.12775/CJFA.2022.014
Susanto, H., Suryadnyana, N. A., Rusmin, R., & Astami, E. (2024). The impact of family firms and supervisory boards on corporate environmental quality. Journal of Risk and Financial Management, 17(7), 263. https://doi.org/10.3390/jrfm17070263
Ullah, S., Akhtar, P., & Zaefarian, G. (2018). Dealing with endogeneity bias: The generalized method of moments (GMM) for panel data. Industrial Marketing Management, 71, 69–78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2017.11.010
Wang, H., Tong, L., Takeuchi, R., & George, G. (2016). Corporate social responsibility: An overview and new research directions. Academy of Management Journal, 59(2), 534–544. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2016.5001
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Dian Permata Sari, Muhammad Fikri, Rina Kartika, Nattapat Tanwattana

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.