Ethical and Legal Challenges of Artificial Intelligence in the Judicial System: An Indonesian Perspective

Authors

  • Wahyu Hidayat Department of Law, University of Mataram, Indonesia
  • Abdullah Muis Department of Law, Universiti Malaya, Malaysia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.70716/justin.v2i1.274

Keywords:

artificial intelligence, judicial system, ethics, legal challenges, indonesia

Abstract

The integration of Artificial Intelligence (AI) into the judicial system has introduced significant opportunities for enhancing efficiency, accuracy, and access to justice. However, it also raises complex ethical and legal challenges, particularly in developing countries such as Indonesia. This study examines the implications of AI adoption in the Indonesian judicial system by focusing on issues of accountability, transparency, fairness, data privacy, and potential bias in algorithmic decision-making. Using a normative juridical approach supported by literature review and analysis of existing regulations, this research highlights the absence of comprehensive legal frameworks governing AI use in judicial processes, which may undermine the principles of due process and the independence of the judiciary. Ethical concerns, such as the risk of dehumanization of justice and the erosion of judicial discretion, further complicate AI implementation. The findings suggest that Indonesia requires a robust regulatory and ethical framework to balance technological innovation with the protection of fundamental rights. This study contributes to ongoing global debates on responsible AI governance in the justice sector and offers recommendations for policy formulation tailored to the Indonesian legal context.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Barfield, W., & Pagallo, U. (2020). Research handbook on the law of artificial intelligence. Edward Elgar Publishing.

Binns, R. (2018). Fairness in machine learning: Lessons from political philosophy. Proceedings of the Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency, 149–159. https://doi.org/10.1145/3287560.3287576

Bowen, G. A. (2009). Document analysis as a qualitative research method. Qualitative Research Journal, 9(2), 27–40. https://doi.org/10.3316/QRJ0902027

Calo, R. (2017). Artificial intelligence policy: A primer and roadmap. U.C. Davis Law Review, 51(2), 399–435.

Council of Europe. (2020). Ad hoc committee on artificial intelligence (CAHAI) feasibility study. Strasbourg: Council of Europe.

European Commission. (2021). Proposal for a regulation laying down harmonised rules on artificial intelligence (Artificial Intelligence Act). Brussels: European Commission.

Floridi, L., Cowls, J., Beltrametti, M., Chatila, R., Chazerand, P., Dignum, V., ... & Vayena, E. (2018). AI4People—An ethical framework for a good AI society: Opportunities, risks, principles, and recommendations. Minds and Machines, 28(4), 689–707. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11023-018-9482-5

Goodman, B., & Flaxman, S. (2017). European Union regulations on algorithmic decision-making and a “right to explanation.” AI Magazine, 38(3), 50–57. https://doi.org/10.1609/aimag.v38i3.2741

Katyal, S. (2019). The paradox of source code secrecy. Cornell Law Review, 104(6), 1183–1232.

Mahardika, I., & Nugroho, F. (2022). Digital transformation in Indonesia’s judiciary: Opportunities and challenges. Indonesian Journal of Law and Technology, 4(1), 45–62.

O’Neil, C. (2016). Weapons of math destruction: How big data increases inequality and threatens democracy. Crown Publishing Group.

Rahardjo, S. (2021). Legal protection in the age of artificial intelligence: An Indonesian perspective. Journal of Indonesian Law and Society, 2(3), 112–128.

Soekanto, S. (2014). Pengantar penelitian hukum. UI Press.

Sourdin, T. (2021). Judges, technology and artificial intelligence: The need for ethical engagement. Law, Technology and Humans, 3(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.5204/lthj.1750

Susskind, R. (2019). Tomorrow’s lawyers: An introduction to your future (2nd ed.). Oxford University Press.

Watson, A. (1974). Legal transplants: An approach to comparative law. Scottish Academic Press.

Widodo, T. (2022). Judicial independence and technological transformation in Indonesia. Yustisia Law Review, 11(2), 201–220.

Downloads

Published

2025-11-30

How to Cite

Hidayat, W., & Muis, A. (2025). Ethical and Legal Challenges of Artificial Intelligence in the Judicial System: An Indonesian Perspective. Justicia Insight, 2(1), 9–15. https://doi.org/10.70716/justin.v2i1.274