Enhancing Numeracy Skills through Realistic Mathematics Education: A School-Based Study at Sekolah Kebangsaan Seri Suria
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.70716/josme.v2i1.409Keywords:
Numeracy Skills, Realistic Mathematics Education, Contextual Learning, Primary Education, Quasi-Experimental StudyAbstract
This study aims to examine the effectiveness of the Realistic Mathematics Education (RME) approach in enhancing students’ numeracy skills at Sekolah Kebangsaan Seri Suria. Numeracy is a fundamental competence that supports students’ ability to apply mathematical concepts in real-life contexts; however, many primary school students experience difficulties in connecting abstract mathematical ideas to everyday situations. To address this issue, a quasi-experimental design with a pre-test and post-test control group was employed. The participants consisted of 60 Year 5 students divided into an experimental group receiving instruction through the RME approach and a control group taught using conventional methods. Data were collected through standardized numeracy tests and classroom observation sheets. The results indicated a statistically significant improvement in the experimental group’s post-test scores compared to the control group. Students exposed to RME demonstrated better conceptual understanding, problem-solving abilities, and engagement during learning activities. The findings suggest that contextual learning tasks, student-centered exploration, and guided reinvention processes embedded in the RME framework contribute positively to numeracy development. This study highlights the importance of integrating realistic contexts into mathematics instruction to foster meaningful learning experiences. It is recommended that primary school teachers adopt RME strategies to strengthen numeracy proficiency and promote deeper mathematical understanding among learners.
Downloads
References
Aunio, P., & Räsänen, P. (2020). Core numerical skills for learning mathematics in children aged five to eight years. Educational Psychology Review, 32(2), 539–567. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-019-09513-4
Bakker, A., Cai, J., & Zenger, L. (2021). Future themes of mathematics education research: An international survey before and during the pandemic. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 107(1), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-021-10049-w
Boaler, J., Dieckmann, J. A., Pérez-Núñez, G., Sun, K. L., & Williams, C. (2021). Changing students’ mindsets and achievement in mathematics: The impact of a free online student course. Frontiers in Education, 6, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2021.690375
Cai, J., Morris, A., Hohensee, C., Hwang, S., & Robison, V. (2020). The role of curriculum resources in teacher learning and instructional improvement. ZDM–Mathematics Education, 52(2), 299–311. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-020-01134-9
Fitriani, H., Widodo, A., & Rochintaniawati, D. (2020). The effectiveness of realistic mathematics education approach in improving students’ problem-solving ability. Journal on Mathematics Education, 11(3), 377–390. https://doi.org/10.22342/jme.11.3.12215.377-390
Geiger, V., Goos, M., & Dole, S. (2021). Numeracy across the curriculum: A critical review of research. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 108(3), 451–469. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-021-10063-y
Gravemeijer, K., Stephan, M., Julie, C., Lin, F. L., & Ohtani, M. (2020). What mathematics education may prepare students for the society of the future? International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 18(1), 105–123. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-019-09981-5
Ingram, N., & Meaney, T. (2022). Mathematics anxiety and numeracy development: A systematic review. Review of Education, 10(1), e3314. https://doi.org/10.1002/rev3.3314
Jablonka, E., & Niss, M. (2020). Numeracy as a competence in mathematics education. ZDM–Mathematics Education, 52(4), 607–620. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-020-01148-3
Laurens, T., Batlolona, F. A., Batlolona, J. R., & Leasa, M. (2020). How realistic mathematics education improves students’ cognitive achievement. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 16(7), em1855. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/8259
OECD. (2023). PISA 2022 results (Volume I): The state of learning and equity in education. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/53f23881-en
Prediger, S., Gravemeijer, K., & Confrey, J. (2022). Design research with a focus on learning processes in mathematics education. Educational Designer, 5(16), 1–28.
Schoenfeld, A. H. (2020). Learning to think mathematically: Problem solving, metacognition, and sense-making. Journal of Education, 200(3), 193–206. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022057420905580)
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Ahmad Farid Rahman, Nur Aisyah Zulkifli

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.








