Strengthening Logical Foundation in Mathematics: A Pathway to Enhance Reasoning Skills

Authors

  • Hitesh Choudhury Dimoria College (Autonomus)

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.70716/josme.v2i1.395

Keywords:

Mathematical Reasoning, Inference Rule, Reconstruction Model, Step–Reason Mapping, Logic-Integrated Mathematical Expression

Abstract

Logical thinking serves as the backbone of understanding mathematics which helps learners to connect concepts, justify methods, and construct meaningful explanation. Many students acquire procedural competence to solve a mathematical problem but they remain unable to clearly explain the reasoning that justifies each mathematical step. This gap between performing mathematical problem and explaining solutions undermines conceptual understanding and hinders the development of higher-order reasoning abilities.  This research paper addresses this issue by presenting a structured pathway for rebuilding a clear and structured logical framework for mathematics learning. This proposed framework emphasizes on deliberately integration of symbolic logic and formal inference rules into regular mathematical pedagogy. The explicit incorporation of logic within problem-solving practices helps learners to move beyond intuitive thinking toward well-justified reasoning. In support of this objective, this study presents three interrelated approaches: Reasoning Reconstruction Model (RRM), Step–Reason Mapping (SRM) and Logic-Integrated Mathematical Expression (LIME). Together, these approaches support students in structuring their thinking, aligning each solution step to logical rules and rebuilding coherent mathematical arguments.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Hanna, G. & de Villiers, M. Proof and Proving in Mathematics education, Doi: 10.1007/978-94-007-2129-6, Springer, New York, 2012.

Stylianides, G. J., & Stylianides, A. J., Studying the implementation of Proof in Classroom, Journal for Research in mathematics Education, 39(4), pp. 314-354, 2008.

Kunth, J., Students understanding of Mathematical Proof, Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 36(5), pp. 379-405, DOI: 10.2307/30034950, 2005.

Simpson, A., & Inglis, M., Conditional Inference and advanced mathematical Thinking, Educational Studies in Mathematics, 67(3), pp. 187-204, 2008.

Weber, K., mathematics Majors Evaluation of Arguments, Journal of mathematical Behavior, 29(1), pp. 36-52, DOI: 10.1016/j.jmathb.2010.01.001, 2010.

Selden, J., & Selden, A., Validations of Proofs in Undergraduates mathematics, Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 17(1), pp. 1-19, 2015.

Harel, G., Intellectual Need and mathematical Reasoning, Journal of mathematical Behavior, 32(2), pp. 247-259, DOI: 10.1016/j.jmathb.2013.03.002, 2013.

Lithner, J., A Research Framework for Creative Reasoning, Educational Studies in Mathematics, 67(3), pp. 267-284, DOI: 10.1007/s10649-007-9104-0, 2008.

Maher, C., & Muller, M., Learning to Reason in mathematics Classroom, Educational Studies in Mathematics, 70(3), pp. 267-284, 2009.

Stylianou, A., Blanton, M., & Rotou, O., Undergraduate Students Understanding of Proof, Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 40, pp. 1-18, 2015.

Bieda, N., Developing mathematical Reasoning, mathematics Teacher Education, 2(1), pp. 5-36, DOI: 10.5951/mathteaceduc.2.1.0005, 2013.

Borwein, J., & bailey, D., Mathematics by Experiment: plausible Reasoning in the 21st Century, CRC Press, USA, 2016.

Principles to Actions: Ensuring Mathematical Success for All, National Council of Teachers of Mathematics, NCTM, UAS, 2014.

Weber, K., Mejia-Ramos, P., & Inglis, M., research on Mathematical Proof and Reasoning, Journal of mathematical Behavior, 57, DOI: 10.1016/j.mathb.2019.1007759, 2020.

Mejía-Ramos, J. P., & Inglis, M., Mathematical Reasoning and Proof Comprehension, Educational Studies in Mathematics, 110(2), pp. 321-340, 2022.

Downloads

Published

2026-03-22

How to Cite

Choudhury, H. (2026). Strengthening Logical Foundation in Mathematics: A Pathway to Enhance Reasoning Skills. Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 2(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.70716/josme.v2i1.395