Training and Developing the Teaching Staff to Meet The Requirements of the 2018 General Education Program: Experiences from Japan
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.70716/jess.v3i2.847Keywords:
teaching staff, teacher education, professional development, 2018 general education program, Japanese pedagogical experiencesAbstract
The training and development of the general education teachers constitute a fundamental determinant of the quality and efficacy of a national education system. Japan represents a typical country in building and developing a high professional teaching force, closely linking initial training, regular fostering, and continuous professional development. Vietnam’s 2018 General Education Program signifies a paradigm shift from a content-based to a competency-based and character-building pedagogical approach, for success, the role of educators is identified as the decisive factor. This study analyzes the Japanese model of professional development for general education teachers and contextualizes these findings within the current Vietnamese educational landscape, particularly in the implementation of Resolution No. 29-NQ/TW and the 2018 General Education Program. Consequently, the paper proposes strategic policy recommendations aimed at enhancing the quality of teacher training and development to meet contemporary educational demands.
Downloads
References
Party Central Committee. (2013). Resolution No. 29-NQ/TW dated November 4, 2013, on fundamental and comprehensive innovation in education and training to meet the requirements of industrialization and modernization in the context of a socialist-oriented market economy and international integration.
Ministry of Education and Training. (2018a). General Education Program: Overall Program. Vietnam Education Publishing House.
Ministry of Education and Training. (2018b). Circular No. 20/2018/TT-BGDĐT dated August 22, 2018, promulgating regulations on professional standards for teachers in general education institutions.
Ministry of Education and Training. (2023). Summary report on the 2022–2023 academic year and directions and tasks for the 2023–2024 academic year.
Caena, F. (2011). Literature review: Quality in teachers' continuing professional development. European Commission. https://ec.europa.eu/assets/eac/education/policy/school/doc/cpd_en.pdf
Cave, P. (2016). Schooling selves: Autonomy, interdependence, and reform in Japanese junior high education. University of Chicago Press.
Lewis, C. C., & Hurd, J. (2011). Lesson study step by step: How teacher learning communities improve instruction. Heinemann.
Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology (MEXT). (2020). Teacher training and professional development in Japan.
Nguyễn Hồng Thuận. (2021). Teacher professional development in the context of educational reform in Vietnam. Vietnam Journal of Educational Sciences, 18(2), 45-58.
OECD. (2019). Education policy outlook: Japan. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/cp773e32-en
Sarkar Arani, M. R. (2017). Lesson study: The heart of Japanese professional development in education. Routledge.
Stigler, J. W., & Hiebert, J. (2016). The teaching gap: Best ideas from the world's teachers for improving education in the classroom. Free Press.
Villegas-Reimers, E. (2003). Teacher professional development: An international review of the literature. UNESCO: International Institute for Educational Planning.
World Bank. (2020). The World Development Report 2020: Trading for development in the age of global value chains. World Bank Publications.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Nguyen Duc Huan, Nguyen Thi Hong

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.








