Analisis Tingkat Kepuasan Pengguna terhadap Sistem E-Learning Berbasis Mobile dengan Pendekatan Technology Acceptance Model
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.70716/alpha.v2i3.759Keywords:
User Satisfaction, Mobile E-learning, Technology Acceptance Model (TAM), Perceived Usefulness (PU), Perceived Ease of Use (PEOU)Abstract
This study aims to analyze user satisfaction with a mobile-based e-learning system using the Technology Acceptance Model approach. The research employed a quantitative approach with an explanatory survey design. The respondents were active users of a mobile-based e-learning system in a higher education environment. Data were collected using a closed-ended questionnaire based on a five-point Likert scale measuring six main variables: perceived ease of use, perceived usefulness, attitude toward using, behavioral intention, actual use, and user satisfaction. A total of 186 valid responses were analyzed using descriptive statistics, validity testing, reliability testing, and multiple linear regression. The results show that user satisfaction was in the high category, with a mean score of 4.01. Perceived usefulness obtained the highest mean score of 4.18, followed by perceived ease of use at 4.12, behavioral intention at 4.05, attitude toward using at 3.96, and actual use at 3.88. The regression results indicate that all Technology Acceptance Model variables significantly influenced user satisfaction, with an R-square value of 0.672. Perceived usefulness was identified as the most dominant factor affecting user satisfaction. These findings indicate that the success of a mobile-based e-learning system is not only determined by the availability of the application, but also by perceived benefits, ease of use, positive attitudes, continuance intention, and actual usage experience. This study provides practical implications for educational institutions to improve feature quality, access speed, navigation, learning content quality, and technical support for mobile e-learning systems.
Downloads
References
Abu-AlSondos, I. A., Anas A. Salameh, Abeer F. Alkhwaldi, Alaa S. Mushtaha, Maha Shehadeh, & Ala’a Al-junaidi. (2023). Evaluating Mobile E-Learning Systems Acceptance: An Integrated Model. International Journal of Interactive Mobile Technologies (iJIM), 17(16), pp. 30–47. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijim.v17i16.42679
Abuhassna, H., Yahaya, N., Zakaria, M. A. Z. M., Zaid, N. M., Samah, N. A., Awae, F., Nee, C. K., & Alsharif, A. H. (2023). Trends on using the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) for online learning: A bibliometric and content analysis. International Journal of Information and Education Technology, 13(1), 131–142. https://doi.org/10.18178/ijiet.2023.13.1.1788
Ajlouni, A., AlOmary, A., Al-Smadi, M., Al-Abdallat, M., & Abu Awwad, F. (2024). Factors influencing student satisfaction with LMS mobile application: A TAM-based SEM analysis. International Journal of Interactive Mobile Technologies, 18(19), 106–128. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijim.v18i19.50237
Al-Hawamleh, A. (2024). Exploring the satisfaction and continuance intention to use e-learning systems. International Journal of Electrical and Computer Engineering Systems, 15(2), 201–214. https://doi.org/10.32985/ijeces.15.2.8
Al-Emran, M., Mezhuyev, V., & Kamaludin, A. (2018). Technology Acceptance Model in m-learning context: A systematic review. Computers & Education, 125, 389–412. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.06.008
Almaiah, M. A., Alamri, M. M., & Al-Rahmi, W. M. (2019). Applying the UTAUT model to explain the students’ acceptance of mobile learning system in higher education. IEEE Access, 7, 174673–174686. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2957206
Almaiah, M. A., Al-Otaibi, S., Lutfi, A., Almomani, O., Awajan, A., Alsaaidah, A., Alrawad, M., & Awad, A. B. (2022). Employing the TAM model to investigate the readiness of m-learning system usage using SEM technique. Electronics, 11(8), 1259. https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics11081259
Alsharida, R. A., Hammood, M. M., & Al-Emran, M. (2021). Mobile learning adoption: A systematic review of the Technology Acceptance Model from 2017 to 2020. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 16(5), 147–162. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v16i05.18093
Budiman, Yoga, T. P., Tanjung, U. S. D., & Alamsyah, N. (2023). Analysis of e-learning user acceptance using the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) and End-User Computing Satisfaction (EUCS). Formosa Journal of Applied Sciences, 2(8), 1873–1892. https://doi.org/10.55927/fjas.v2i8.5405
Chand, S. S., Kumar, B., Goundar, M. S., & Narayan, A. (2022). Extended UTAUT model for mobile learning adoption studies. International Journal of Mobile and Blended Learning, 14(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.4018/ijmbl.312570
Chao, C.-M. (2019). Factors determining the behavioral intention to use mobile learning: An application and extension of the UTAUT model. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, Article 1652. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01652
Huang, J.-H., Lin, Y.-R., & Chuang, S.-T. (2007). Elucidating user behavior of mobile learning: A perspective of the extended Technology Acceptance Model. The Electronic Library, 25(5), 585–598. https://doi.org/10.1108/02640470710829569
Joo, Y. J., Lee, H. W., & Ham, Y.-K. (2014). Integrating user interface and personal innovativeness into the TAM for mobile learning in Cyber University. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 26(2), 143–158. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12528-014-9081-2
Koim, M. ., Wasilah, Chairani, Sriyanto, & Sri Lestari. (2025). Analyzing User Acceptance of NFJuara Mobile Application Using TAM and D&M IS Success Model. Sinkron : Jurnal Dan Penelitian Teknik Informatika, 9(4), 1912-1923. https://doi.org/10.33395/sinkron.v9i4.15209
Mugo, D. G., Njagi, K., Chemwei, B., & Motanya, J. (2017). The Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) and its application to the utilization of mobile learning technologies. British Journal of Mathematics & Computer Science, 20(4), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.9734/BJMCS/2017/29015
Sabbar, S. D., Kadir, A. R., Nohong, M., Mannan, A., Alkanan, O. M. T., & Anter, S. A. (2025). Adoption of mobile learning: Education’s use of app-based learning management systems and ethical implementation. International Journal of Interactive Mobile Technologies, 19(18), 175–188. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijim.v19i18.57611
Shishakly, R., Almaiah, M. A., Al-Otaibi, S., Lutfi, A., Alrawad, M., & Almulhem, A. (2023). A new technological model on investigating the utilization of mobile learning applications: Extending the TAM. Multimodal Technologies and Interaction, 7(9), Article 92. https://doi.org/10.3390/mti7090092
Szymkowiak, A., & Jeganathan, K. (2022). Predicting user acceptance of peer-to-peer e-learning: An extension of the Technology Acceptance Model. British Journal of Educational Technology, 53(6), 1993–2011. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13229
Widiantoro, A. D., Murniati, C. T., & Hartono, H. (2022). Examining user acceptance and satisfaction of HE’s e-learning platform. World Journal on Educational Technology: Current Issues, 14(5), 1234–1245. https://doi.org/10.18844/wjet.v14i5.7200
Zhonggen, Y., & Xiaozhi, Y. (2019). An extended technology acceptance model of a mobile learning technology. Computer Applications in Engineering Education, 27(3), 721–732. https://doi.org/10.1002/cae.22111
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Zaydan Arka Mahendra, Keira Safira Nadhira, Elvano Rafiq Pradipta

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.








